Police Officer’s Conduct and Judicial Examination Fraud
In the offense of intra-fraud, the complaint was filed between the police officer, , who collected evidence, Mr. Daeng filed a complaint against Mr. Dam in the offense of fraud regarding the judicial examination of the objection lawsuit. Subsequently, a warrant was issued by the court to indict Mr. Dam, and a summons was issued for him to defend the case. Then, Mr. Non went to court and gave a statement of denial, along with a request for the court to release him, and the court approved a temporary release as follows: If the police officer is aware of the complaint of all the aforementioned victims and concludes the investigation and submits it to the prosecutor immediately without taking any action, the prosecutor will consider whether the actions of the police officer are correct and will issue a response. If the police officer learns of the complaint while conducting the collection of evidence, the prosecutor will immediately take no action. Furthermore, if the plaintiff, Mr. Non, still investigates the case, then , it will be necessary to continue investigating the case according to the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 3. Mr. , residing in Chiang Mai province, was dissatisfied with Mr. Suay, who owned property there.