Bangkok Legal Service

Intentional Damage to Property and Interference with Personal Effects

Legal illustration: Intentional Damage to Property and Interference with Personal Effects
Legal illustration: Intentional Damage to Property and Interference with Personal Effects

Exhibit 6. Mr. Pin and Mr. Piow both harbored affections for Ms. Paeo. Mr. Pin provided Ms. Paeo with a photograph. Ms. Paeo affixed said photograph to her pillow. Mr. Piow was greatly displeased. On the evening of the 1st of Ms. Paeo’s birthday, Mr. Piow surreptitiously entered Ms. Paeo’s bedroom and took Mr. Pin’s photograph, throwing it into the Le River.

What offenses does Mr. Piow commit?

Mr. Piow entered Ms. Paeo’s bedroom and discarded her belongings into the Le River. It was not an act of fraudulent appropriation of another’s property for his own benefit or the benefit of another. The sole intention in this matter was to damage property.

Therefore, he is liable for offenses under Section 358 and 365 of the Penal Code.

Mr. Bheum then boarded the bus to and stood waiting at the bus stop.