Bangkok Legal Service

False National Identity Card Use and Forgery Offenses

Legal illustration: False National Identity Card Use and Forgery Offenses
Legal illustration: False National Identity Card Use and Forgery Offenses

Regarding the photograph of Mr. Kao and Mr. , it was understood that Mr. ‘s national identity card was overlaid with Mr. ‘s national identity card. Subsequently, Mr. submitted an application with the photograph he had created, marked 170 (faxed), to apply for employment at Kao Company Limited. Subsequently, on the following day, Mr. submitted the application with the photograph he had created to apply for employment at Purple Company Limited, as follows: Does Mr. commit any offenses? A national identity card is a document issued by the National Identity Card Office of the Ministry of Interior. Section 1 (8) of the Criminal Code. The national identity card created by Mr. is a false copy. Although it is a photograph of a false national identity card created by Mr. Kao, it is intended for use as a national identity card. Mr. ‘s actions constitute the forgery of a public document. Even if the fax appears only as a photograph of a false national identity card created by Mr. , it does not use or present the false copy, it is a document provided by the fax machine to the fax machine, which is binding to the user of the fax machine, which is equivalent to Mr. using or presenting the false national identity card. Mr. ‘s actions constitute the use of a public document. Regarding whether the fax of the false national identity card presented is used or not, it is evident that the officials issued or certified it via fax. Therefore, Mr. ‘s actions are merely the use of a common document on the following day when he applied for employment at the Ministry of Justice. Mr. is therefore guilty of using a false public document. Mr. is liable for the following actions: Mr. ‘s actions are different, namely, Mr. is guilty of forging a public document when he submitted the false national identity card to Kao Company Limited. He is guilty of using a forged document, according to Article 268 of the Penal Code, Paragraph , which imposes a penalty for using a forged document. In addition, Mr. went to submit the application with the national identity card to Purple Company Limited. Mr. did not forge a new public document, he used the same false national identity card. Mr. is liable only for the offense of using it alone.

In almost every situation involving criminal offenses prohibited by law, officials must face responsibility. Not only is it determined who is responsible, but more importantly, whether a crime has been committed. Therefore, the types of arrests and investigations have a direct relationship with the efficiency of law enforcement. The classification of offenses as independent offenses and offenses leads to the clarity of the principles of criminal law, but this is not always the case. The problem depends on the perception or opinion of the witnesses providing information about criminal behavior. produced asbestos tiles (fiberglass tiles) without providing appropriate dust masks for workers at the company, thus violating safety regulations of the government or should be sued for assault. The backward measurement of distances in a car is a fraudulent act obtained from others.

Question, B.E. 2541
Question for selection to be appointed as a Prosecutor in the position of Assistant Prosecutor, Criminal Law Course
(Provide detailed reasons for your answers)
Standing in front of a store