Amicable Estate Division and Guardianship Dispute Resolution
Mr. Piset, the deceased, had Ms. Ek as his wife and three children with her. Both Ms. Ek and the three children – Mr. Tree, aged 22 years, Mr. Jattwa, aged 16 years – entered into an agreement for the amicable settlement and division of Mr. Piset’s estate. Ms. Ek was granted land and a house, Mr. Tree was granted paddy land, and Mr. Jattwa was granted land and a textile factory. One month after the death of Mr. Piset, Mr. Tree, who managed the textile factory, transferred the factory to Mr. Tree. Mr. Tree then filed a lawsuit seeking to have the building transferred to him according to the agreement. If you were a judge, how would you rule? Answer: Dismiss the lawsuit because of the agreement for amicable settlement, as Ms. Ek, who held the guardianship of Mr. Jattwa, did not obtain permission 1574/8) and could not separate a complete portion from an incomplete portion, as the portion received was inextricably linked, not merely pertaining to the minor. Referencing Paragraph 1319/.2512 of the Civil Procedure Code. Mr. Yai secretly plotted and shot Mr. Buim, a rival, on the route Mr. Buim had previously traversed.