Bangkok Legal Service

Deputy Attorney General’s Authority Regarding Prosecution of Assault Claims

Legal illustration: Deputy Attorney General’s Authority Regarding Prosecution of Assault Claims
Legal illustration: Deputy Attorney General’s Authority Regarding Prosecution of Assault Claims

1d. September 30, 1982, there was no person holding the position of Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General considered that the investigations conducted by the Office of the Attorney General in Chachoengsao Province in 1982-1984 were numerous and required the assistance of a prosecuting attorney. He issued an order for a prosecuting attorney to be assigned and proceeded to accept the duties and to file a lawsuit to maintain custody of the position of District Attorney in Chachoengsao Province. One case was brought before the Chachoengsao Provincial Court. The Plaintiff lacked the power to sue. The judgment of the Chachoengsao Provincial Court was either favorable or unfavorable. The judgment of the Chachoengsao Provincial Court was not conclusive. The Deputy Attorney General had the power to appoint a prosecuting attorney to serve as an interim official in this position. The Deputy Attorney General did not need to notify the court of jurisdiction. For example, Section 12(1).

Civil Procedure Law, Procedural Law, the Supreme Court Rules, and Evidence Law.

The Plaintiff was assaulted and sexually molested by Mr. Jampee, and his authority was forcibly taken by the Monk.